Research Paper

Has Ohio Been Defunding Public Education?

Examines two decades of Ohio public-school funding, enrollment, spending, state/local shares, scholarships, and competing claims about whether education has been “defunded.”

Publication Date

August 11, 2026

Author / Organization

Ohio Common Ground

Topic Area

Ohio Property Taxes

PAPER NUMBER

White Paper No. 015

RESEARCH CENTER NO.

RL-2026-023

VERSION NO.

1

VERIFICATION STATUS

Verified — Published Research

VERIFICATION DATE

August 11, 2026

Read the Complete White Paper

Download the original Ohio Common Ground white paper, including its complete analysis, notes, tables, and source documentation.

Format: PDF

Type: White Paper

Download Full White Paper

RESEARCH Overview

Executive Summary

Two slogans dominate Ohio's school-funding debate: that public education has been “defunded” for decades, and that schools have “never had more money.” This report asks what actually happened to the money supporting Ohio public schools.

The central finding is structural: apparently contradictory facts can be simultaneously true because “funding” can mean total or per-pupil dollars, nominal or inflation-adjusted dollars, state share or combined state-and-local revenue, or formula-calculated versus appropriated funding.

Insights

Key Findings

  • Funding is not one number.
  • Long-run growth: revenue and spending rose in nominal, inflation-adjusted, and per-pupil terms.
  • Enrollment fell 8.3% over the long-run series while real operating expenditure per pupil increased about 26%.
  • State share declined from roughly 42% to 36% in the all-funds series.
  • Scholarship spending increased from roughly $175 million in FY2014 to about $1.10 billion in FY2025.

Framework

Methodology & Scope

Figures come from Ohio and federal primary sources. The paper keeps distinct funding universes separate: all-funds revenue/expenditure, state appropriations, foundation-delivered aid, and scholarship payments. Nominal, real, total, per-pupil, state-share, and formula measures are not conflated.

context & qualifications

Limitations & Notes

Descriptive, not evaluative. No judgment is made on adequacy, fairness, or policy wisdom. The paper evaluates a defined set of claims, makes no causal estimate between funding and outcomes, and uses mixed data vintages that are not treated as interchangeable.

Access the Complete Research Report

Download the full PDF version for offline reading, complete data tables, and citation details.

Download PDF Document